I've just found this: https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/CXF-596?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:all-tabpanel
The fix applies to CXF 2.0, we're using CXF 2.2 and still experience something very similar; possibly a Camel issue? We're using camel-cxf 1.6.2. Can't find anything on Camel's Jira, crossposting to camel-users. 2009/12/10 Max Ferrari <[email protected]>: > Hi List, > we are using in a camel route a cxf producer (client) enpoint with > MTOM enabled. > The consumer (server) at the moment is a 'black box' sitting in our > customer's environment. > > The issue: > following to an (apparently) valid request from our CXF client, the > server replies with a SOAP fault: > <SOAP-ENV:Fault><faultcode>Sender</faultcode><faultstring>cannot get > mime part</faultstring></SOAP-ENV:Fault> > > I've analyzed the http conversation and I observe that: > > - In the SOAP part of the request the attachments are included as: > <xop:Include xmlns:xop="http://www.w3.org/2004/08/xop/include" > href="cid:5726d366-df25-4945-9f3b-3003a2ae8a70-3@http%3A%2F%2Fcxf.apache.org%2F"/> > > (please notice escaped cxf.apache.org URI in the cid) > > - instead, the actual Content-Id in the multipart POST part is unescaped: > Content-ID: <5726d366-df25-4945-9f3b-3003a2ae8a7...@http://cxf.apache.org/> > > The point is that, if I replay using Fiddler the same request, by > replacing the escaped part of the cid with an unescaped one, so that > XOP and MIME content IDs are exactly the same: > <xop:Include xmlns:xop="http://www.w3.org/2004/08/xop/include" > href="cid:5726d366-df25-4945-9f3b-3003a2ae8a70-3@http://cxf.apache.org/"/> > > then the server replies with a 200 OK. > > Now, I suspect that the escaped cid in the SOAP part is perfectly > legal and that it's the consumer implementation's fault not matching > it correctly to the MIME part. > However I'd need some clear normative references to discuss this to > the customer. > > Actually at http://www.w3.org/TR/2004/CR-xop10-20040826/#mime_xop_packages > I read: > Part metadata is reflected in MIME header fields. Specifically, the > URI used in the value of an href attribute information item on a > xop:Include element information item contains a URI that uses the > 'cid:' scheme (see [RFC 2392]), so the corresponding MIME part MUST > have a Content-ID header field (see [RFC 2387] with a corresponding > field-value. > > Some comments from CXF developers would be greatly appreciated. > > Thanks > > Max >
