Makes sense. Thanks. On Mon, Dec 21, 2009 at 5:25 PM, Claus Ibsen <[email protected]> wrote:
> Hi > > Use doTry .. doCatch and move the messages yourself to DLQ. > > It was just way to complex to have per processor individual error handling. > So now its two scoped: per context and per route > > > On Mon, Dec 21, 2009 at 4:21 PM, Pavel <[email protected]> wrote: > > Hi, > > > > Is subj still possible? My specific case is that I want to forward > message > > to DLQ if error happened in JAXB unmarshaller, but redeliver for > everything > > else. > > In Camel 2.0 it was possible to supply error handler reference to > > <camel:unmarshal /> (spring DSL), but that's not the case. > > > > For reference, route is activemq -> unmarshal -> bean -> marshal -> > > (reply-to destination) > > > > Thanks, > > Pavel > > > > > > -- > Claus Ibsen > Apache Camel Committer > > Author of Camel in Action: http://www.manning.com/ibsen/ > Open Source Integration: http://fusesource.com > Blog: http://davsclaus.blogspot.com/ > Twitter: http://twitter.com/davsclaus > -- Best regards, Pavel
