yeah. Thanks for the explanation

I see the interest to use that now :)

Charles Moulliard
Senior Enterprise Architect
Apache Camel Committer

*****************************
blog : http://cmoulliard.blogspot.com
twitter : http://twitter.com/cmoulliard
Linkedlin : http://www.linkedin.com/in/charlesmoulliard

Apache Camel Group :
http://www.linkedin.com/groups?home=&gid=2447439&trk=anet_ug_hm


On Thu, Feb 18, 2010 at 5:46 PM, Claus Ibsen <[email protected]> wrote:

> On Thu, Feb 18, 2010 at 5:43 PM, Charles Moulliard <[email protected]>
> wrote:
> > I had a look to the stream Resequencer example and I have a last question
> :
> >
> > If we have a thread blocking the processing of one of the message, what
> will
> > be the benefit to use a streamResequencer vs consume sequentially
>  messages
> > as finally the resequencer has to wait that all the messages have been
> > processed before to send them to the next endpoint ?
> >
>
> The resequencer will only wait until it got the next missing message.
>
> If you need to send messages in the order 1, 2, 3, 4 and 5.
>
> And they arrive as
>
> 3,1 will send 1 as its the first one we need
> 3,4 is in queue now, waiting for 2
> 3,4,2 all will be send as we got 2,3,4 ordered now
> 5 will be send asap
>
>
> >
> > Charles Moulliard
> > Senior Enterprise Architect
> > Apache Camel Committer
> >
> > *****************************
> > blog : http://cmoulliard.blogspot.com
> > twitter : http://twitter.com/cmoulliard
> > Linkedlin : http://www.linkedin.com/in/charlesmoulliard
> >
> > Apache Camel Group :
> > http://www.linkedin.com/groups?home=&gid=2447439&trk=anet_ug_hm
> >
> >
> > On Thu, Feb 18, 2010 at 5:00 PM, Claus Ibsen <[email protected]>
> wrote:
> >
> >> On Thu, Feb 18, 2010 at 4:52 PM, Charles Moulliard <
> [email protected]>
> >> wrote:
> >> > Hi ,
> >> >
> >> > I try to figure out if it is possible or make sense to increase the
> >> number
> >> > or threads (because we would like to increase performances, ...) of a
> >> camel
> >> > jms consumer (defined as a endpoint = from) when the messages must be
> >> > processed according to their order ?
> >> >
> >> > ex : delivery order of the messages in the queue
> >> >
> >> > message 1, message 2, message3
> >> >
> >> > Message 1 must be processed before 2 and 3 because the information
> >> present
> >> > in this message must be displayed on the console before the 2 and 3.
> >> >
> >> > If I increase the number of threads of my route, camel will consume
> >> message
> >> > 1, 2 and 3 at the same time but when the result will be delivered to
> the
> >> > last endpoint of the route, the order could be completely different.
> So
> >> I'm
> >> > not sure that we can increase performances of the platform by
> increasing
> >> the
> >> > number threads in this case !
> >> >
> >>
> >> You could resequence the messages before that last step.
> >> http://camel.apache.org/resequencer.html
> >>
> >> Just that processing of the messages can happen out of order and in
> >> parallel then all you need at the end is to re-order them using the
> >> resequencer EIP.
> >> For that you need an unique numbering. I doubt the JMSMessageId can be
> >> used as its just unique but not in ascending order.
> >>
> >> I think the resequencer uses Long for numbering and that they number
> >> be ordered, eg. 1,2,3,4 and so forth.
> >> And its currently in memory only which means the messages are kept in
> >> memory. And it uses another thread to dispath the message outwards,
> >> which means that transactions doesnt work to well.
> >>
> >> In the future the resequencer will have support for a persistent data
> >> store.
> >>
> >>
> >>
> >>
> >> > Kind regards,
> >> >
> >> > Charles Moulliard
> >> > Senior Enterprise Architect
> >> > Apache Camel Committer
> >> >
> >> > *****************************
> >> > blog : http://cmoulliard.blogspot.com
> >> > twitter : http://twitter.com/cmoulliard
> >> > Linkedlin : http://www.linkedin.com/in/charlesmoulliard
> >> >
> >> > Apache Camel Group :
> >> > http://www.linkedin.com/groups?home=&gid=2447439&trk=anet_ug_hm
> >> >
> >>
> >>
> >>
> >> --
> >> Claus Ibsen
> >> Apache Camel Committer
> >>
> >> Author of Camel in Action: http://www.manning.com/ibsen/
> >> Open Source Integration: http://fusesource.com
> >> Blog: http://davsclaus.blogspot.com/
> >> Twitter: http://twitter.com/davsclaus
> >>
> >
>
>
>
> --
> Claus Ibsen
> Apache Camel Committer
>
> Author of Camel in Action: http://www.manning.com/ibsen/
> Open Source Integration: http://fusesource.com
> Blog: http://davsclaus.blogspot.com/
> Twitter: http://twitter.com/davsclaus
>

Reply via email to