Hi Claus, after having more thoughts about the claim check thing, I don't think its the right thing for my need. I need to be able to lazy load some stuff on demand. I don'T know when I need it because users can plugin their own implementation to process the object. Sometimes they don't need to access the MimeMessage so I don'T want to load it. Sometimes they do.
So I need more something like lazy loading in the JPA world.. So I will look into the BlobMessage. Thx again, Norman 2010/3/2 Norman Maurer <norman.mau...@googlemail.com>: > Hi Claus, > > yeah claim check sounds like the one I was looking for. > > Yes I was refering the the AMQ BlobMessage because from my > understanding it is the way you usual handle such stuff with AMQ. > > Thx again, > Norman > > 2010/3/2 Claus Ibsen <claus.ib...@gmail.com>: >> On Tue, Mar 2, 2010 at 8:42 AM, Norman Maurer <nor...@apache.org> wrote: >>> Hi all, >>> >>> we just switched to using Camel + Activemq for message routing and >>> spooling in JAMES. At the moment we store the whole MimeMessage as a >>> byte array in the payload of the Exchange. This is super inefficient >>> because of the possibility of very big emails. So I consider using >>> BlobMessages for storing the MimeMessage out of the band. So is there >>> any example in sending a BlobMessage via ProducerTemplate ? >>> >> >> By out of band I assume you mean the claim check EIP? >> http://camel.apache.org/claim-check.html >> >> And BlobMessage is it the AMQ type? >> org.apache.activemq.BlobMessage >> >> I recon you need to grab the InputStream from the BlobMessage to be >> used as the body to be send using ProducerTemplate. >> >> >>> >>> Thx, >>> Norman >>> >> >> >> >> -- >> Claus Ibsen >> Apache Camel Committer >> >> Author of Camel in Action: http://www.manning.com/ibsen/ >> Open Source Integration: http://fusesource.com >> Blog: http://davsclaus.blogspot.com/ >> Twitter: http://twitter.com/davsclaus >> >
