Same behavior observed with SEDA. 20 exchanges received by processor log,
activemq


On Mon, Aug 23, 2010 at 3:00 PM, Charles Moulliard <[email protected]>wrote:

> I will try with seda.
>
> Version used is camel-2.5-SNAPSHOT
>
>
> On Mon, Aug 23, 2010 at 2:47 PM, Claus Ibsen <[email protected]>wrote:
>
>> Hi
>>
>> Could you try sending to a seda endpoint instead of direct.
>>
>> And what version of Camel are you using?
>>
>>
>> On Mon, Aug 23, 2010 at 2:04 PM, Charles Moulliard <[email protected]>
>> wrote:
>> > Hi,
>> >
>> > I have created a very simple camel route to check statistics of camel
>> >
>> >
>> from("direct:test").to("log:org.apache.camel.example?level=INFO").to("activemq:queue:test.queue");
>> >
>> > 10 messages are sent to the direct endpoint and 10 messages are
>> published in
>> > the queue of activemq
>> >
>> > What is strange ?
>> >
>> > 1) Number of exchanges completed by the processor "LOG" or "ACTIVEMQ" is
>> > equal to 20 and not 10. Should it be equal to 10 ?
>> >
>> > ExchangesCompleted : 20
>> > ExchangesTotal : 20
>> >
>> > 2) Time measured on the route is not the sum of each processor
>> >                                 activemq processor - log processor -
>> route
>> > LastProcessingTime : 18 - 0 - 19
>> > MaxProcessingTime : 380 - 14 - 406
>> > MeanProcessingTime : 53 - 1 - 57
>> > MinProcessingTime : 16 - 0 - 17
>> > TotalProcessingTime : 1078 - 27 - 573 ???
>> >
>> > Regards,
>> >
>> >
>> > Charles Moulliard
>> >
>> > Senior Enterprise Architect (J2EE, .NET, SOA)
>> > Apache Camel - Karaf - ServiceMix Committer
>> > ~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~
>> > Blog : http://cmoulliard.blogspot.com |  Twitter :
>> > http://twitter.com/cmoulliard
>> > Linkedin : http://www.linkedin.com/in/charlesmoulliard | Skype:
>> cmoulliard
>> >
>>
>>
>>
>> --
>> Claus Ibsen
>> Apache Camel Committer
>>
>> Author of Camel in Action: http://www.manning.com/ibsen/
>> Open Source Integration: http://fusesource.com
>> Blog: http://davsclaus.blogspot.com/
>> Twitter: http://twitter.com/davsclaus
>>
>
>

Reply via email to