On Tue, Sep 14, 2010 at 4:58 PM, Olivier.Roger <olivier.ro...@bsb.com> wrote:
>
> hello Camel!
>
> Is it possible to use generics in annotated converters ?
>
> I tried to do this
>
> �...@converter
> public <T> T toPayload(Message<T> msg){
> return msg.getPayload();
> }
>
> Which does not work. However, replacing <T> by a real class definition is
> working for that type.
> I would like to avoid to create one converter for each type of payload my
> messages can have, is that possible ?
>
Use the @FallbackConverter
http://camel.apache.org/type-converter.html
> Thanks in advance,
>
> Olivier
> --
> View this message in context:
> http://camel.465427.n5.nabble.com/Converter-Generics-tp2839250p2839250.html
> Sent from the Camel - Users mailing list archive at Nabble.com.
>
--
Claus Ibsen
Apache Camel Committer
Author of Camel in Action: http://www.manning.com/ibsen/
Open Source Integration: http://fusesource.com
Blog: http://davsclaus.blogspot.com/
Twitter: http://twitter.com/davsclaus
