It is a good improvement, +1 from me too. Christian, go for it!
Hadrian

On Nov 3, 2010, at 11:40 PM, Willem Jiang wrote:

> It makes sense, +1 for the change.
> 
> On 11/4/10 7:28 AM, Christian Müller wrote:
>> Hello Rafal!
>> 
>> Please provide more details like the Camel version you are using in
>> further questions. Please have a look here:
>> http://camel.apache.org/how-can-i-get-help.html
>> 
>> However, I assume you have a String as payload in your message. The
>> default Camel type converter mechanism is able to convert this payload
>> also into an InputStream. This is the reason, why this is ambiguous for
>> Camel...
>> 
>> I wondering, if we SHOULD make Camel a bit smarter here. I made a patch
>> which fixes this issue. We check whether the message payload is an
>> instance of the bean method argument. If so, we will use this method and
>> don't convert the body. Any objections?
>> 
>> Cheers,
>> Christian
> 
> 
> -- 
> Willem
> ----------------------------------
> FuseSource
> Web: http://www.fusesource.com
> Blog:    http://willemjiang.blogspot.com (English)
>         http://jnn.javaeye.com (Chinese)
> Twitter: willemjiang

Reply via email to