The question is maybe more general. Is it possible to associate a transaction with more then two threads?
As multicast is able to process to operations (to) in parallel, for each operation (to) an own thread need to be started. Which results in the problem that one transaction context has to be associated with two different threads. Maybe I am wrong, but I guess that is not possible. I think it will throw an: javax.transaction.InvalidTransactionException: Specified transaction is already associated with another thread -- View this message in context: http://camel.465427.n5.nabble.com/multicast-transaction-tp474719p3267036.html Sent from the Camel - Users mailing list archive at Nabble.com.
