Hi Willem,
Thank you for the quick fix. My complete trunk sync/build is taking
time. So I just applied the same change to my local 2.5.0 source for a
quick test. And now it is working fine.

When the trunk build is done, I can run the test with it.

Thanks.

Regards, aki

On Wed, Dec 15, 2010 at 7:53 AM, Willem Jiang <[email protected]> wrote:
> FYI,I just committed a patch of CAMEL-3426 into Camel trunk.
> Please check out the latest Camel 2.6-SNAPSHOT for verification.
>
> On 12/14/10 10:03 PM, Willem Jiang wrote:
>>
>> Hi,
>>
>> I just reproduce the error by writing a simple test case as you
>> described, and created a JIRA[1] for it.
>>
>> [1] https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/CAMEL-3426
>>
>> On 12/13/10 11:16 PM, Aki Yoshida wrote:
>>>
>>> Hi,
>>> I have a simple scenario using the file endpoint that polls a file and
>>> sends it to a oneway CXF endpoint that calls an external web service.
>>> The scenario works fine with Camel 2.4.0 with CXF 2.2.11, but does not
>>> work with Camel 2.5.0.
>>>
>>> The processing itself works fine with 2.5.0, but after the successful
>>> completion of a call, the pipleline does not set the status of the
>>> call, resulting in the file endpoint never commiting the operation and
>>> the file remaining in the polling directory.
>>>
>>> As the same scenario that calls a request-response CXF service works
>>> fine with Camel 2.5.0, the problem seems to be caused by some changes
>>> in the Camel's pipeline behavior for oneway calls.
>>>
>>> I tried to debug the 2.4.0 and 2.5.0 pipeline code. However, the
>>> change between these versions is significant and I could not identify
>>> what was exactly causing the different behavior. I was wondering if
>>> someone is aware of this problem and could point me to the solution.
>>>
>>> I would appreciate your comments.
>>>
>>> Thanks.
>>> Regards, Aki
>>>
>>
>>
>
>
> --
> Willem
> ----------------------------------
> FuseSource
> Web: http://www.fusesource.com
> Blog:    http://willemjiang.blogspot.com (English)
>         http://jnn.javaeye.com (Chinese)
> Twitter: willemjiang
>

Reply via email to