On 10 February 2011 20:13, Ashwin Karpe <aka...@fusesource.com> wrote: > > Hi James, > > I like the approach. It certainly replaces the need to have a Strategy and > eliminates the need to inject a context into a component.
Thanks! Am sure there's uses for the RouteBox approach when folks want to do different things; though my gut feel was just to use regular Camel endpoints as the 'API' to the black boxed components; then you can use the regular Camel routing engine as the 'strategy' for consuming from those endpoints and doing Content Based Routing or whatever. > If everyone agrees, I will be happy to develop this capability along these > lines and open it up for review and comment. Great stuff thanks! BTW before I sent the previous email I'd checked in an implementation and a number of test cases to check it worked; using concise or verbose URIs using the Java DSL. Though we need more testing of using this concept more with Spring; we might have a few gremlins when working with multiple contexts and using some of the injection & annotation features; which up to now have tended to assume only a single CamelContext etc. -- James ------- FuseSource Email: ja...@fusesource.com Web: http://fusesource.com Twitter: jstrachan Blog: http://macstrac.blogspot.com/ Open Source Integration
