Yes and no, I would say. You're right that it's better to have 2 different machines. But IMHO, it's better to have failover between 2 instances on the same machine than no fail over at all...
2011/3/29 Achim Nierbeck <bcanh...@googlemail.com> > Hi Mike, > > but this only makes sense when you use multiple instances on different > machines. > Doing Failover on the same machine I would rather not recommend. > > Regards, Achim > > 2011/3/29 Michael Dewitte <michael.dewi...@gmail.com>: > > Hi, > > > > nice thread, thanks for the sharing... to me, multiple instances makes > sense > > for fail-over. Just configure it through the ActiveMQ... > > > > Mike > > > > > > 2011/3/29 Achim Nierbeck <bcanh...@googlemail.com> > > > >> Hi Gonzalo, > >> > >> Makes sense, besides one point, why do you expect you need multiple > >> Karaf instances? > >> Regarding Camel or Spring there is no need to deploy those in extra > >> Servers, because you only got > >> one CamelContext/SpringContext per bundle. Therefore I'm sure you can > >> use one Karaf instance with all your routes. ActiveMQ can be deployed > >> on top of Karaf too, since it is the basis for ServiceMix :) > >> > >> One reminder though, if you need to communicate effectively between > >> different Camel routes in different bundles you should think about > >> NMR, which runs best with ServiceMix :) > >> > >> > >> Regards, Achim > >> > >> 2011/3/29 gonzalo diethelm <gdieth...@dcv.cl>: > >> >> Hi, > >> > > >> > Hi Achim, thanks for answering. > >> > > >> >> just my 0.02$ on a container/runtime. > >> >> My best experience as runtime for Camel is to use Karaf. > >> >> If you need more out of the box components like ActiveMQ and so forth > >> >> you might also consider to use Servicemix. > >> > > >> > OK, my incipient plan so far is to use Karaf to host each of my > services > >> as a separate bundle, and maybe have several Karaf instances running on > a > >> single machine. Each bundle (service) will use Spring for its > configuration > >> and wiring, including bootstrapping Camel. I expect to be able, as well, > to > >> configure ActiveMQ in this setup directly from Spring, and hopefully > avoid > >> (for now) ServiceMix, since it seems "pure" Camel will cover all my > needs. > >> Does this make sense to you? > >> > > >> > -- > >> > Gonzalo Diethelm > >> > > >> > > >> > > >
