Hi Charles, thanks for your answer,
i asked it just because i found the dynamic routing for example is a bit slow compared to other technics (because it is very generic which is pretty nice for integration routes :)). Thanks again, i think i'll have a try and choose after but i'm more confident now to use camel for such a purpose. - Romain 2011/4/22 Charles Moulliard <cmoulli...@gmail.com> > Hi Romain, > > If by business flows, you mean flows developed using BPEL or BPMN, I > would like to say that you can develop something similar in Camel > without the dependency with XML files describing the flows, link > between the webservices as this is the case with BPEL > > You can create small camel routes containing beans and starting from a > Transactional client (jms, jdbc, ...) and placing at the end the > message, objects into a new Transactional client. In this case, a > camel can be compared to a collection of process where the status of > the flow is not saved in to a DB but by example the queue used to > place the messages represent the status of the flow (ex : queue:in, > queue:validation, queue:transformation). With persistence JMS Message, > you can recover messages and restart your camel route from where it > fails during a crash. You can also combine Camel Routes with a BPMN > engine like Activiti (camel-activiti) to leverage on the best of Camel > and Business Process Engine. > > Just my 2cents > > Regards, > > Charles > > On Sun, Apr 17, 2011 at 4:36 PM, Romain Manni-Bucau > <rmannibu...@gmail.com> wrote: > > Hi all, > > > > what do you think about using camel for business flows? Is it a good idea > or > > other open source framework will do better (faster?)? > > > > I ask it because technically i see how to do but i don't know if it is a > > good idea because it is not the first goal of camel. > > > > - Romain > > >
