On Thu, Jul 7, 2011 at 11:44 AM, Andrè <[email protected]> wrote: > yes, i do or shouldnt i do that ?? > > (context:i´m trying to use the topic as a many/many thing..., where > producers send and one consumer responds and a other just listens, which > should as close as possible to JMS (thats why i dont use a wiretap)) >
You can disable camel-jms to map the received message. You can add this option to the uri in broker A mapJmsMessage=false You can read about this option at http://camel.apache.org/jms But you will still have the problem that broker B send back a reply as a Java Object, and that Java Object class is not on the classpath on broker A. So you would need to copy the JAR that has those classes to broker A as well. > -- > View this message in context: > http://camel.465427.n5.nabble.com/Failed-to-build-body-from-content-Serializable-class-not-available-to-broker-tp4556486p4560507.html > Sent from the Camel - Users mailing list archive at Nabble.com. > -- Claus Ibsen ----------------- FuseSource Email: [email protected] Web: http://fusesource.com Twitter: davsclaus, fusenews Blog: http://davsclaus.blogspot.com/ Author of Camel in Action: http://www.manning.com/ibsen/
