Or a compatible license, ALv2 is not the only one. (L)GPL is viral
though and will hinder Apache Camel's adoption. We don't have much of a
choice. There quite a few OSI [1] licenses available, and authors have
the right to chose whatever they want.
That, of course, doesn't prevent you, a user, to use Camel together with
any projects you like, if you are happy with the licensing terms. Camel
for instance already uses jsch from jcraft.com, but that's licensed
under a BSD style license.
Hadrian
[1] http://www.opensource.org/licenses
On 09/30/2011 01:45 PM, Ujeen wrote:
Ok, that's clear. Then we need to forget about compressing for a while unless
somebody creates something following Apache license.
--
View this message in context:
http://camel.465427.n5.nabble.com/The-SFTP-component-the-keyboard-interactive-auth-method-support-tp4853523p4857904.html
Sent from the Camel - Users mailing list archive at Nabble.com.
