Hi,
Servicemix 4.x support Camel(and Cxf, Activemq) out of the box, not
only including ship camel features and lots of pre-installed specs/
bundles, but also means the fine-tuned jre.properties and
custom.properties which control the exported package by system bundle
and the org.osgi.framework.bootdelegation which ensure it's better
support for specs/technologies like jaxb/jaxws which will affect
several camel components.
Freeman
On 2011-11-2, at 上午5:55, boday wrote:
my take is that unless you explicitly need any Servicemix features,
then just
use Karaf because its lighter weight, etc...
diwakar wrote:
Hi,
Thanks for the replies.
http://stackoverflow.com/questions/6930236/apache-karaf-vs-
servicemix has
the two primary reason for using ServiceMix is if you want 1)
an ESB, 2) NMR (a feature that allows you to community between
bundles AND
instances of Karaf)
AFAIK Camel does not use servicemix NMR and Camel itself
is like
an ESB.
It is still not clear how hosting Camel in Servicemix 4.x is
better than Karaf.
With Best Regards,
Diwakar
-----
Ben O'Day
IT Consultant -http://consulting-notes.com
--
View this message in context:
http://camel.465427.n5.nabble.com/Karaf-vs-Servicemix-4-x-tp4954984p4956433.html
Sent from the Camel - Users mailing list archive at Nabble.com.
---------------------------------------------
Freeman Fang
FuseSource
Email:ff...@fusesource.com
Web: fusesource.com
Twitter: freemanfang
Blog: http://freemanfang.blogspot.com
