It's not "Camel mainly makes sense with a broker like ActiveMQ". There are many other easons why you should use Camel also without a message broker. I want only let you know 1) what the benefit of a message broker is and 2) what customers says is sometimes not what they really want... ;-)
Best, Christian On Mon, Apr 2, 2012 at 4:25 PM, unludo <unl...@gmail.com> wrote: > I see that Camel mainly makes sense with a broker like ActiveMQ, as a core > for a scalable/decoupled system. > > Thanks for helping me understanding this! > > -- > View this message in context: > http://camel.465427.n5.nabble.com/scalable-bus-with-multiple-Camel-instances-tp5606593p5612599.html > Sent from the Camel - Users mailing list archive at Nabble.com. >
