Hi Michael, Thanks for the reply. Sure, I will look into the page and will also share my benchmarks with the community. Meanwhile, can you or someone else, please point me to some material on the internet which mentions usage of Camel in online, low-latency applications? Thanks MK
On Fri, Aug 10, 2012 at 12:20 PM, michal.warecki [via Camel] < ml-node+s465427n5717114...@n5.nabble.com> wrote: > Look at S. England-Sullivan's post on > http://camel.465427.n5.nabble.com/fyi-SI-td5716049.html . > There are performance tests with Camel+JMS and Camel+Simple JMS. With > proper configuration Camel+JMS overhead (JMS is quite heavy protocol) is > from 1367ms to 424ms for 1000 msgs, so 100 msgs/s is not a problem. > > Camel provides the ability to create mediation routes in minutes, so I > think you should just create a benchmark tests. Do not forget to share with > us the results :-) > > ------------------------------ > If you reply to this email, your message will be added to the discussion > below: > > http://camel.465427.n5.nabble.com/Camel-usage-in-Online-usecases-tp5717058p5717114.html > To unsubscribe from Camel usage in Online usecases, click > here<http://camel.465427.n5.nabble.com/template/NamlServlet.jtp?macro=unsubscribe_by_code&node=5717058&code=bWthcnRoaWsuaGVyZUBnbWFpbC5jb218NTcxNzA1OHwtMzc4NDc0NzY2> > . > NAML<http://camel.465427.n5.nabble.com/template/NamlServlet.jtp?macro=macro_viewer&id=instant_html%21nabble%3Aemail.naml&base=nabble.naml.namespaces.BasicNamespace-nabble.view.web.template.NabbleNamespace-nabble.view.web.template.NodeNamespace&breadcrumbs=notify_subscribers%21nabble%3Aemail.naml-instant_emails%21nabble%3Aemail.naml-send_instant_email%21nabble%3Aemail.naml> >
