No one? Are these equivalent? 2012/11/5 David J. M. Karlsen <davidkarl...@gmail.com>: > Hi. > > I have a route where the from endpoint is jms based. > The end of the route will be a jms endpoint as well. > I also have errorhandling in an onException clause which will put the > message on a third jms queue. > > So in short - jms in - jms out. > > I wanna protect this messagehandling with a jms transaction handler (all > resources use the same connection factory so that messages cannot be lost. > > I can either configure the route to use <transacted /> as described in: > http://camel.apache.org/transactional-client.html. > > But I can also just configure the jms endpoints to use transacted=true as > described in: > http://camel.apache.org/jms.html > > is there any difference at all by configuring them either way? > > > > -- > View this message in context: > http://camel.465427.n5.nabble.com/transactional-client-vs-transacted-true-on-a-jms-route-tp5722167.html > Sent from the Camel - Users mailing list archive at Nabble.com.
-- -- David J. M. Karlsen - http://www.linkedin.com/in/davidkarlsen
