Hello Carsten! Any news about the licensing stuff of Hibersap? It looks like you still use the GNU LESSER GENERAL PUBLIC LICENSE [1].
[1] http://hibersap.sourceforge.net/hibersap-1.0/license.html Best, Christian On Fri, Jan 20, 2012 at 9:27 AM, cerker <[email protected]> wrote: > Björn, thanks a lot for sharing your camel-hibersap component. I only just > started playing around with camel and liked it very much. Now there is a > good reason to take a deeper look. > > It's good to hear that Hibersap helped you with your project. Regarding the > license, I think there should be no problems to combine libraries that are > under the Apache license and ones under LGPL (at least in their current > versions). We initially liked the idea of a copyleft license and LGPL is > the > one most widely used. After all, I am not a lawyer and the big disadvantage > of LGPL is that nobody seems to fully understand it and things are open to > interpretation. Anyway, I'll have a talk with some people in my company who > have a deeper understanding of OS licenses and we'll rethink the > licensing.... > > If you got any questions feel free to contact me via email or use the > Hibersap forums or issue tracker on Sourceforge. > > Best Regards, > Carsten > (Founder of the Hibersap project) > > -- > View this message in context: > http://camel.465427.n5.nabble.com/Do-Apache-Camel-needs-a-SAP-integration-tp5144926p5159788.html > Sent from the Camel - Users mailing list archive at Nabble.com. > --
