Do you recommend using PooledConnectionFactory instead of CachingConnectionFactory?
Because if the replyToCacheLevelName doesn´t solve the problem, maybe we should change to PooledConnectionFactory... -- View this message in context: http://camel.465427.n5.nabble.com/JMS-Shared-fixed-reply-queue-doesn-t-consume-all-the-messages-tp5721700p5722837.html Sent from the Camel - Users mailing list archive at Nabble.com.
