Hi, RMI and Sockets are very different level and for different purposes. If you want to expose and invoke java services over a network, RMI could be an option. Sockets are more low level. Although the Apache Mina implementation in Camel is actually really good at dealing with TCP streams (http://camel.apache.org/mina.html).
There are a lot of protocols and communication methods implemented in Camel: http://camel.apache.org/components.html Each of them have pros and cons, so it's very much up to what type of problem you are trying to solve. Can you specify a bit more how your scenario looks like? Best Regards Petter Nordlander ________________________________________ Från: prashanth141443 [pprashant...@gmail.com] Skickat: den 3 januari 2013 12:13 Till: users@camel.apache.org Ämne: Need Suggestion regarding the Camel Hi all, I am a newbie to camel after referring books i got a bit of knowledge of camel. I am in need of requirement where i will getting the requests through tcp which i ll manipulating. Now my question is that which is advantageous to use either Socket or Rmi. As per my analysis socket programming is the best option for me. Need some suggestions on this pls. Thanks -- View this message in context: http://camel.465427.n5.nabble.com/Need-Suggestion-regarding-the-Camel-tp5724828.html Sent from the Camel - Users mailing list archive at Nabble.com.
