On 24 May 2013 16:15, Claus Ibsen <[email protected]> wrote: > There is no bug on the seda consumer.
Claus, you are right as always, there is no bug. I was referring to line 196 from SedaConsumer [1] If an exception happens during processing, it is logged and not propagated back, but that is never the case, because the exception is always caught and set to the exchange beforehand, so it is propagaed at line 194 Cheers Bilgin [1] https://fisheye6.atlassian.com/browse/camel/trunk/camel-core/src/main/java/org/apache/camel/component/seda/SedaConsumer.java?hb=true#to196 > He sends a InOnly message. > So the consumer can only "handle" the exception itself by logging it. > > If he does a InOut then the producer template will wait for the reply > message, and because it failed with the exception, the reply message is the > exception. > > > On Fri, May 24, 2013 at 5:09 PM, Bilgin Ibryam <[email protected]> wrote: > > > Hi, > > > > can you try to set the exception on the exchange instead of throwing it? > > If that's the case then I think there might a bug in SedaConsumer which > > propagates back exceptions on the exchange but doesn't propagate thrown > > exceptions. > > > > Bilgin > > > > > > On 24 May 2013 12:31, dancerjohn <[email protected]> wrote: > > > > > > > > I disagree... the javadoc for ProducerTemplate.sendBody() states > "Notice: > > > that if the processing of the exchange failed with an Exception it is > > > thrown > > > from this method as a CamelExecutionException with the caused exception > > > wrapped.". So if an exception is thrown during processing sendBody > should > > > throw a CamelExecutionException. > > > > > > The point I am making is that when the channel is a direct channel this > > > DOES > > > happen. However, everything else being the same if the channel is a > stub > > > this DOES NOT happen. Therefore there is a difference in the components > > > between direct and stub in this regard. This seems surprising. > > > > > > > > > > > > -- > > > View this message in context: > > > > > > http://camel.465427.n5.nabble.com/Why-doesn-t-the-stub-component-throw-exceptions-in-tests-tp5733041p5733083.html > > > Sent from the Camel - Users mailing list archive at Nabble.com. > > > > > > > > > -- > Claus Ibsen > ----------------- > www.camelone.org: The open source integration conference. > > Red Hat, Inc. > FuseSource is now part of Red Hat > Email: [email protected] > Web: http://fusesource.com > Twitter: davsclaus > Blog: http://davsclaus.com > Author of Camel in Action: http://www.manning.com/ibsen >
