Hello, thx for the reply. But even if the consumer is not transaction secure, it should not happen that mails are marked as seen but don't get processed. I haven't found why this happens exactly, but I have described where it happens in my previous posts. I'm wondering that no one had this behavior before. Maybe you can give me a hint how to fix this problem so that I can probaply apply a patch for the community. I'm also happy with other suggestions like your environment causes the problem(but I don't think it is an environment problem :) ).
kind regards, Christoph Claus Ibsen-2 wrote > Hi > > No the mail consumer is not TX per see. When it marks a mail as SEEN > it cannot do this in an atomic transaction. > Also there is a bit difference when using pop3 or imap. -- View this message in context: http://camel.465427.n5.nabble.com/MailComponent-MailConsumer-misses-Mails-tp5733010p5734001.html Sent from the Camel - Users mailing list archive at Nabble.com.
