On Fri, Jun 21, 2013 at 1:27 PM, Maurice <maur...@betzel.net> wrote: > Nothing new there, but why use the jms component on this workaround which > connects to amq? This does not give much confidence on an issue that is > already not working as it should. >
What do you mean? activemq-camel is the preferred component to use if you use ActiveMQ. If you are not, then use the generic camel-jms. And they both support XA and non-XA transactions. > > > -- > View this message in context: > http://camel.465427.n5.nabble.com/Camel-JMS-or-activeMQ-component-for-xa-transactions-tp5734515p5734525.html > Sent from the Camel - Users mailing list archive at Nabble.com. -- Claus Ibsen ----------------- www.camelone.org: The open source integration conference. Red Hat, Inc. FuseSource is now part of Red Hat Email: cib...@redhat.com Web: http://fusesource.com Twitter: davsclaus Blog: http://davsclaus.com Author of Camel in Action: http://www.manning.com/ibsen
