Willem.Jiang wrote > The enricher is just a common EIP implementation, we don't care much about > the implementation of message.
That's right, so implementation of exchange creation should be injectable. Willem.Jiang wrote > I think we can enhance the enrich DSL by providing the plugin parameter to > prepare the exchange for enricher target, but it real depends on how the > enricher wants to reuse the message. > > Just my 2 cents. And I can see that you agree :) with me in this matter. Additional DSL param can be passed - default implementation would invoke old message copy. How does it work in Camel community? Should I post the idea somewhere or maybe created jira issue, propose patch? Robert Budźko -- View this message in context: http://camel.465427.n5.nabble.com/Enricher-coping-strategy-tp5735290p5735340.html Sent from the Camel - Users mailing list archive at Nabble.com.
