+1 ... good idea Claus
On Mon, Jul 29, 2013 at 4:32 PM, Raul Kripalani <[email protected]> wrote: > +1. It would enable many interesting solutions. > On 29 Jul 2013 15:48, "Christian Müller" <[email protected]> > wrote: > > > +1 > > > > Best, > > Christian > > Am 29.07.2013 11:00 schrieb "Claus Ibsen" <[email protected]>: > > > > > Hi > > > > > > Yeah if you use java code and create the SedaEndpoints manually. You > > > can pass in the queue instance of your choice. > > > > > > Though maybe we should have an interface for a queue factory so people > > > can configure this once on the seda component once, and have it work > > > out of the box? > > > > > > > > > On Mon, Jul 29, 2013 at 10:52 AM, gquintana <[email protected] > > > > > wrote: > > > > Hi, > > > > > > > > Is it possible to configure a SEDA endpoint so as to handle > priorities > > > using > > > > a PriorityBlockingQueue instead of LinkedBlockingQueue, and > optionally > > > > provide a Comparator to sort messages? > > > > > > > > Thanks, > > > > Gérald > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > -- > > > > View this message in context: > > > > > > http://camel.465427.n5.nabble.com/SEDA-with-PriorityBlockingQueue-tp5736411.html > > > > Sent from the Camel - Users mailing list archive at Nabble.com. > > > > > > > > > > > > -- > > > Claus Ibsen > > > ----------------- > > > Red Hat, Inc. > > > Email: [email protected] > > > Twitter: davsclaus > > > Blog: http://davsclaus.com > > > Author of Camel in Action: http://www.manning.com/ibsen > > > > > > -- *Christian Posta* http://www.christianposta.com/blog twitter: @christianposta
