Please take a look at this page[1], you can get every thing you need :) [1]http://camel.apache.org/threading-model.html
-- Willem Jiang Red Hat, Inc. Web: http://www.redhat.com Blog: http://willemjiang.blogspot.com (http://willemjiang.blogspot.com/) (English) http://jnn.iteye.com (http://jnn.javaeye.com/) (Chinese) Twitter: willemjiang Weibo: 姜宁willem On Thursday, August 29, 2013 at 5:31 AM, Connie Yang wrote: > I'm currently using camel-core-2.11.1.jar. In one of the routes, I'm using > multicast, parallel processing with a time aware aggregation strategy. The > goal is to perform a set of tasks simultaneously with a timeout upon > aggregation. > > In my load and performance testing, I noticed that a Java unbounded thread > pool was created as the aggregateExecutor in MulticastProcessor, which has > caused some of the performance issues in my application. > > Is there a way for me to pass or inject a bounded Java thread pool for the > aggregation effort as it does not have to be that big in my case? If not, > are there any other alternatives for the fork-n-join processing in Camel? > > Thanks, > Connie > > > > -- > View this message in context: > http://camel.465427.n5.nabble.com/How-to-pass-a-bounded-Java-threadpool-as-the-aggregateExecutorService-in-MulticastProcessor-tp5738170.html > Sent from the Camel - Users mailing list archive at Nabble.com > (http://Nabble.com).
