I think you could add the DSL support for the soap fault message, or some validation of the response code which can tell the difference between the right response or the fault message.
Just my 2 cents. -- Willem Jiang Red Hat, Inc. Web: http://www.redhat.com Blog: http://willemjiang.blogspot.com (http://willemjiang.blogspot.com/) (English) http://jnn.iteye.com (http://jnn.javaeye.com/) (Chinese) Twitter: willemjiang Weibo: 姜宁willem On Tuesday, October 22, 2013 at 1:49 PM, David MacDonald wrote: > I've received some feedback and refactored it to give an appearance of being > a Camel-style DSL for testing, i.e. > > > This gets rid of a lot of the bootstrap code there was with JUnit. Any more > feedback is more than welcome. > > > > -- > View this message in context: > http://camel.465427.n5.nabble.com/Testing-DSL-based-on-Apache-Camel-tp5740992p5742008.html > Sent from the Camel - Users mailing list archive at Nabble.com > (http://Nabble.com).
