Since JMS is asynchrous this is expected. Why do you need them in a specific order? If you really do then I would put an aggregator on the consuming route and write an aggregation strategy that would enforce order.
*Robert Simmons Jr. MSc. - Lead Java Architect @ EA* *Author of: Hardcore Java (2003) and Maintainable Java (2012)* *LinkedIn: **http://www.linkedin.com/pub/robert-simmons/40/852/a39 <http://www.linkedin.com/pub/robert-simmons/40/852/a39>* On Sun, Dec 15, 2013 at 11:17 PM, Dayakar <daya.kond...@gmail.com> wrote: > Hi Claus,Thanks for your reply.I want to add some more information.We are > having a route which is configured with parallel > Processing.from("jms:queue:jobQueue" + "?" + Constants.CONCURRENT_CONSUMERS > + "=" + > (Constants.CONCURRENT_CONSUMERS) + "&" > + > Constants.MAX_CONCURRENT_CONSUMERS + "=" > + > (Constants.MAX_CONCURRENT_CONSUMERS) + "&" > + > Constants.MAX_MESSAGES_PERTASK + "=" > + > (Constants.MAX_MESSAGES_PERTASK)) .transacted() .process(new > JobProcessor()) > .split((body())) .to("jms:queue:destinationQueue");Where Job > Processor > prepares a list, each list contains two Messages ex: List1(m1, m2) > List(m3,m4) List(m5, m6)By using Split() method, we keep each message > in > Outbound Queue (m1, m2, m3, m4, m5, m6).While fetching messages from > outbound queue using ConsumerTemplate > consumerTemplate.receiveBodyNoWait("jms:queue:destinationQueue", > String.class);/*we are not getting insertion order (m2, m1, m4, m5, m3, > m6).*/We are using camel 2.9.2.jar and VM Broker.Please help us to resolve > this issue.Regards,Dayakar > Dayakar wrote > > Hi Claus,We are using Camel 2.9.2 version. > > > > > > -- > View this message in context: > http://camel.465427.n5.nabble.com/ConsumerTemplate-is-not-fetching-data-in-insertion-Order-tp5744663p5744813.html > Sent from the Camel - Users mailing list archive at Nabble.com. >
