It makes sense, I just filled a JIRA[1] for it. [1]https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/CAMEL-7181
-- Willem Jiang Red Hat, Inc. Web: http://www.redhat.com Blog: http://willemjiang.blogspot.com(http://willemjiang.blogspot.com/) (English) http://jnn.iteye.com(http://jnn.javaeye.com/) (Chinese) Twitter: willemjiang Weibo: 姜宁willem On February 8, 2014 at 9:35:48 AM, yirco ([email protected]) wrote: > > Hi, > > the CXF description states: > > http://camel.apache.org/cxf.html#CXF-AttachmentSupport > > > Attachment Support > > "/POJO Mode: > > Attachments are propagated to Camel message's attachments > since 2.1. So, it > is possible to retreive attachments by Camel Message API > > DataHandler Message.getAttachment(String id)/" > > However, /org.apache.camel.component.cxf.DefaultCxfBinding/ > explicitly > excludes attachments propagation for POJOs. This makes processing > legacy > SOAP with attachments more difficult. > > I suggest easing the condition for POJOs that do not use MTOM: > > if dataFormat is POJO and properties.mtom-enabled is false, > propagate the > attachments into and from the camel Exchange. > > Thank you. > > > > > -- > View this message in context: > http://camel.465427.n5.nabble.com/CXF-component-attachment-support-for-POJO-not-implemented-as-specified-tp5746952.html > > Sent from the Camel - Users mailing list archive at Nabble.com. >
