In the the dropbox core API zip file there is a License.txt https://www.dropbox.com/developers/downloads/sdks/core/java/dropbox-java-sdk-1.7.6.zip --- Copyright (c) 2013 Dropbox Inc., http://www.dropbox.com/
Permission is hereby granted, free of charge, to any person obtaining a copy of this software and associated documentation files (the "Software"), to deal in the Software without restriction, including without limitation the rights to use, copy, modify, merge, publish, distribute, sublicense, and/or sell copies of the Software, and to permit persons to whom the Software is furnished to do so, subject to the following conditions: The above copyright notice and this permission notice shall be included in all copies or substantial portions of the Software. THE SOFTWARE IS PROVIDED "AS IS", WITHOUT WARRANTY OF ANY KIND, EXPRESS OR IMPLIED, INCLUDING BUT NOT LIMITED TO THE WARRANTIES OF MERCHANTABILITY, FITNESS FOR A PARTICULAR PURPOSE AND NONINFRINGEMENT. IN NO EVENT SHALL THE AUTHORS OR COPYRIGHT HOLDERS BE LIABLE FOR ANY CLAIM, DAMAGES OR OTHER LIABILITY, WHETHER IN AN ACTION OF CONTRACT, TORT OR OTHERWISE, ARISING FROM, OUT OF OR IN CONNECTION WITH THE SOFTWARE OR THE USE OR OTHER DEALINGS IN THE SOFTWARE. -- Why would this license stop the camel-dropbox component from beeing released under the Apache License ? To me the dropbox API license seems pretty permissive. // Pontus On Fri, Mar 7, 2014 at 12:36 PM, Henryk Konsek <[email protected]> wrote: >> What I can not answer is, if the dropbox license and terms of conditions >> meet the general ASF requirements or not. > > Apparently not. > >> If it is not possible to contribute the component to the ASF branch, I would >> vote for a contribution to camel-extra. > > I asked to author of the DropBox pull request if he would like to > contribute the project to Camel Extra. > > Cheers. > > -- > Henryk Konsek > http://henryk-konsek.blogspot.com
