https://www.ohloh.net/p/camel vs. https://www.ohloh.net/p/4367
In a Nutshell, Apache Camel...
has had 19,744 commits made by 82 contributors
representing 953,023 lines of code
...
is mostly written in Java
with an average number of source code comments
...
has a well established, mature codebase
maintained by a very large development team
with stable Y-O-Y commits
...
took an estimated 264 years of effort (COCOMO model)
starting with its first commit in March, 2007
ending with its most recent commit 2 days ago
In a Nutshell, openadaptor...
has had 3,059 commits made by 21 contributors
representing 581,079 lines of code
...
is mostly written in Java
with a well-commented source code
...
has a well established, mature codebase
maintained by nobody
with stable Y-O-Y commits
...
took an estimated 156 years of effort (COCOMO model)
starting with its first commit in January, 2001
ending with its most recent commit about 3 years ago
Best,
Christian
-----------------
Software Integration Specialist
Apache Member
V.P. Apache Camel | Apache Camel PMC Member | Apache Camel committer
Apache Incubator PMC Member
https://www.linkedin.com/pub/christian-mueller/11/551/642
On Tue, Apr 22, 2014 at 4:05 PM, anujkhandelwal <[email protected]
> wrote:
> Hi,
>
> I am trying to use an enterprise integration framework. Confused between
> two
> producets
> 1) Camel 2)Openadaptor.
>
> I have already gone through
>
> http://camel.465427.n5.nabble.com/camel-vs-openAdapter-vs-xbus-td4522979.html
> and I understand that both uses different patterns. But if someone can tell
> me the benefits of Camel over openadaptor, it will be a big help for me.
>
> And is there any performance benchmark of camel. I was not able to find
> anything about camel performance.
>
> Thanks,
> Anuj
>
>
>
>
>
> --
> View this message in context:
> http://camel.465427.n5.nabble.com/Apache-Camel-vs-Openadaptor-tp5750436.html
> Sent from the Camel - Users mailing list archive at Nabble.com.
>
