Also note that there is a DSL mechanism to mangle propagation of headers:
http://camel.apache.org/how-to-avoid-sending-some-or-all-message-headers.html


2014-06-27 19:47 GMT+02:00 Matt Sicker <[email protected]>:

> Thank you, that actually helped quite a bit! I see that using the in
> message is just more convenient than copying headers all the time for an
> InOut chain.
>
>
> On 27 June 2014 00:44, Claus Ibsen <[email protected]> wrote:
>
> > Hi
> >
> > See this FAQ
> > http://camel.apache.org/using-getin-or-getout-methods-on-exchange.html
> >
> > If you have a copy of the Camel in Action book, see page 66 for more
> > details as well.
> >
> > On Thu, Jun 26, 2014 at 10:44 PM, Matt Sicker <[email protected]> wrote:
> > > I don't understand what the point of using the out message is. It
> doesn't
> > > copy headers. It doesn't signify the end of a route as far as I can
> tell.
> > > It's not used for a reply message. I don't think any of the official
> > Camel
> > > components even use the out message. What good is it for?
> > >
> > > In my own project, I've created a final processor that copies the in
> > > message to the out message and selectively fills in headers that were
> > > configured for that processor. I don't even know why I do this other
> than
> > > as a way to get rid of the myriad JMS headers that get passed around
> from
> > > using JMS (and occasionally rogue HTTP headers returned from a SOAP
> call
> > > somewhere).
> > >
> > > Are there any good resources or explanations as to the point of the out
> > > message? It seems to complicate things as it doesn't seem as though you
> > can
> > > send a dual-message of anything by using both the in and out messages.
> > >
> > > --
> > > Matt Sicker <[email protected]>
> >
> >
> >
> > --
> > Claus Ibsen
> > -----------------
> > Red Hat, Inc.
> > Email: [email protected]
> > Twitter: davsclaus
> > Blog: http://davsclaus.com
> > Author of Camel in Action: http://www.manning.com/ibsen
> > hawtio: http://hawt.io/
> > fabric8: http://fabric8.io/
> >
>
>
>
> --
> Matt Sicker <[email protected]>
>



-- 
--
David J. M. Karlsen - http://www.linkedin.com/in/davidkarlsen

Reply via email to