Well done. I think you found the golden middle ground!
On 31 July 2014 11:36, sarveswaran_m <sarveswara...@yahoo.com> wrote: > Based on th replies and search done so far, we have come to the following > conclusion: > > Spawning separate JVM for each route is greedy. > Bundling all routes with-in a single JVM makes the solution vulnerable to > greedy-route problem. > Bundling related routes together and deploying them with in one JVM seems > to > the reasonable middle-ground. > > We are considering Master-slave fail over for routes as well. > Thanks for the useful replies. > > > > -- > View this message in context: > http://camel.465427.n5.nabble.com/one-context-or-multiple-contexts-tp5754635p5754722.html > Sent from the Camel - Users mailing list archive at Nabble.com. > -- Bilgin Ibryam Red Hat, Inc. Apache Camel & Apache OFBiz committer Blog: ofbizian.com Twitter: @bibryam <https://twitter.com/bibryam> Author of Instant Apache Camel Message Routing http://www.amazon.com/dp/1783283475
