I think it's the other way around. You can make a bunch of from(foo).to(bar), then do a from(bar) to get the combined channel.
On 12 September 2014 10:29, toomanyedwards <[email protected]> wrote: > I understand that a route can have multiple inputs that lead to the same > processing something like: > routeBuilder.from("direct:foo, direct:bar").to("direct:doSomething"); > > But in the case I described earlier: > myRouteDefinition = routeBuilder.from("direct:foo"); > myRouteDefinition.to("direct:doSomething"); > > myRouteDefinition.from("direct:buzz"); > myRouteDefinition.to("direct:doSomethingElse"); > > isn't this almost effectively two distinct routes vs multiple inputs into > the same route? > > -e > > > > -- > View this message in context: > http://camel.465427.n5.nabble.com/Why-does-RouteDefinition-have-from-methods-tp5756370p5756426.html > Sent from the Camel - Users mailing list archive at Nabble.com. > -- Matt Sicker <[email protected]>
