Hi Claus,

Thank you again for your reply. Unfortunately I did not see anything
in that FAQ that relates to my problem.

>From route A, I am invoking route B (serially) that deletes a header
key. I would like the header key to exist for route A afterwards even
though route B deleted it. Using a splitter works great. I can not get
enrich or recipientList to work.

This is a contrived example. The general use case is invoking routes
without side-effects so they can be called recursively -- as
subroutines.


Thanks,

cg

On Tue, Nov 11, 2014 at 12:00 AM, Claus Ibsen <[email protected]> wrote:
> See this FAQ
> http://camel.apache.org/why-is-my-message-body-empty.html
>
> On Tue, Nov 11, 2014 at 8:22 AM, Camel Guy <[email protected]> wrote:
>> Hi Claus,
>>
>> Thanks for the pointer!
>>
>> This program logs "INFO hello" followed by an empty INFO message. I
>> would like the second logged message to also be "INFO hello."
>>
>> Am I doing something wrong?
>>
>> Camel 2.14.0
>>
>>
>> Thank you,
>> ~cg
>>
>> <route>
>>   <from uri="direct:Test"/>
>>   <setHeader headerName='bar'><constant>hello</constant></setHeader>
>>   <log message="${header.bar}"/>
>>   <enrich uri="direct:Foo"/>
>>   <log message="${header.bar}"/>
>> </route>
>>
>> <route>
>>   <from uri="direct:Foo"/>
>>   <removeHeader headerName='bar'/>
>> </route>
>>
>> On Mon, Nov 10, 2014 at 10:06 PM, Claus Ibsen <[email protected]> wrote:
>>> See about the content enricher
>>>
>>> On Tue, Nov 11, 2014 at 4:21 AM, Camel Guy <[email protected]> wrote:
>>>> Hello,
>>>>
>>>> I am using Spring XML. I would like to invoke a route synchronously,
>>>> passing the current Exchange. However, I want to discard the changes
>>>> that the invoked route makes to the Exchange (e.g., modification of
>>>> headers).
>>>>
>>>> So far this is the shortest recipe that results in the desired behavior:
>>>>
>>>> <split><constant>1</constant><to uri="direct:Foo"/></split>
>>>>
>>>> Is there a more elegant way to do this?
>>>>
>>>> I tried <recipientList><constant>direct:Foo</constant></recipientList>
>>>> but the current Exchange was modified.
>>>>
>>>>
>>>> Thanks,
>>>> ~cg
>>>
>
>
>
> --
> Claus Ibsen
> -----------------
> Red Hat, Inc.
> Email: [email protected]
> Twitter: davsclaus
> Blog: http://davsclaus.com
> Author of Camel in Action: http://www.manning.com/ibsen
> hawtio: http://hawt.io/
> fabric8: http://fabric8.io/

Reply via email to