Am 15.12.14 14:38 schrieb "andrewcelerity" unter <and...@celerityglobal.com>:
>I am using Camel 2.14.0. > >I do see one problem, though maybe it's just a lack of understanding of >the >process you're using to compare results. Annotations like @Consume have a >retention policy of runtime, meaning the compiler leaves them in the >compiled class file (I believe). Your decompiled code does not show any >annotations. Well spotted. I used jad to decompile Foo.class: http://varaneckas.com/jad Which apparently did not take the @Consume annotation into the account, don't know why. That said using JAD produced the expected @Consume annotated method: http://jd.benow.ca But as Willem has already said it could help us if you would provide a concrete code showing the problem in Java 8, like some compilation errors or a failing test in Java 8 which works properly in Java 7 and what not. Then we could nail down the problem in case there¹s any. Babak > >I fully expect to see the same methods generated via Java 7 and 8, but the >annotations on them should be different in the 8 generated byte code. > > > > > >-- >View this message in context: >http://camel.465427.n5.nabble.com/Changes-in-Java-8-generics-breaking-Came >l-tp5760638p5760703.html >Sent from the Camel - Users mailing list archive at Nabble.com.
