Hello,
I think for the most part you did a good job but IMHO I really don't
understand how you can make a comparison of both when you say :
Since IB9 is a full fledged ESB, it allows developers to deploy their
routing and mediation logic onto integration nodes which host
integration servers across the enterprise. This is an extremely powerful
offering as it makes it easy for teams to *hot deploy* their integration
solutions very easily without having to worry about painful class
loading issues that driven me mad in IBM WebSphere *Application Server*.
You're talking about an application Server of IBM and you compare it to
Camel.. This is so wrong.
You should blog about ServiceMix (or Apache Camel - Apache Karaf -
Apache ActiveMQ -...) and not only focus on Apache Camel to get the
whole picture.
Regards,
Morgan
On 1/05/2015 6:03, jamie3 wrote:
Here is the second post in the series.
http://beertechcode.blogspot.ca/2015/05/the-30000-foot-view-of-apache-camel-and.html
--
View this message in context:
http://camel.465427.n5.nabble.com/Comparison-of-Apache-Camel-and-IBM-Integration-Bus-v9-0-tp5766171p5766563.html
Sent from the Camel - Users mailing list archive at Nabble.com.
