Really just trying to make sure I understand how the configuration works. If
I auto configure activemq with Spring Boot, I have noticed that an activemq
component is also created in the camel context. Is Spring Boot creating
this component or the camel context?
So when I need to have a component configured differently, should I make the
configuration changes on the endpoint or just create a different component?
Are there really any differences between these two configurations?
-----------------------------------
create new component to handle transaction.
@Bean
public ActiveMQComponent activemqtx(PooledConnectionFactory
pooledConnectionFactory) {
ActiveMQComponent activeMQComponent = new ActiveMQComponent();
activeMQComponent.setTransacted(true);
activeMQComponent.setTransactionManager(new
JmsTransactionManager(pooledConnectionFactory));
return activeMQComponent;
}
from("activemq:TRIGGER").routeId("Trigger")
.onException(Exception.class)
.maximumRedeliveries(2)
.to("activemq:EXCEPTION")
.markRollbackOnlyLast().end()
.transacted()
.bean("jpaRepository")
.to("log:out");
Or just configure the enpoint.
from("activemq:TRIGGER?transacted=true").routeId("Trigger")
.onException(Exception.class)
.maximumRedeliveries(7)
.to("activemq:EXCEPTION")
.markRollbackOnlyLast().end()
.transacted()
.bean("jpaRepository")
.to("log:out");
I'm guessing that creating a component allows for better reuse if you have
several routes using the same configuration.
Sample code I have been testing with
https://github.com/zachariahyoung/docker-camel
--
View this message in context:
http://camel.465427.n5.nabble.com/Camel-and-Activemq-setup-with-Spring-Boot-tp5774544p5774728.html
Sent from the Camel - Users mailing list archive at Nabble.com.
