It returns the qualifiers for the Instance injection point declaration, not the
ones added with select programmatically! I’ve tested it with OWB version 1.6.2.
Weld returns the complete set of qualifiers as opposed to OWB.
> On 22 Feb 2016, at 17:36, John D. Ament <johndam...@apache.org> wrote:
>
> Hi Antonin!
>
> For #2, that's weird. What do you see in the output?
>
> John
> On Feb 22, 2016 11:24, "Antonin Stefanutti" <anto...@stefanutti.fr> wrote:
>
>> Hi John,
>>
>> Good to hear from you here! Thanks for the thorough testing, that’s a good
>> catch.
>>
>> So I’ve looked into it and apparently the problem is two folds:
>> - The implementations do not assume the @Any qualifier by default for
>> programmatic lookup as they do for static injection.
>> - OpenWebBeans does not return the correct set of refined qualifiers when
>> calling InjectionPoint.getQualifiers in producer methods for Instance with
>> selected qualifiers.
>>
>> I have a fix for the former. I’ll polish it a bit and commit it ASAP. For
>> the later, I’ll report an issue in OWB JIRA and reactivate the test case
>> once it gets fixed.
>>
>> Antonin
>>
>>> On 22 Feb 2016, at 13:40, John D. Ament <johndam...@apache.org> wrote:
>>>
>>> Hi all,
>>>
>>> I was looking at the changes that went into Camel 2.17 with CDI injection
>>> support. It seems that injection support doesn't work consistently when
>>> done not using an annotated member.
>>>
>>> I tried a few different ways:
>>>
>>> @Inject
>>> @Any
>>> private Instance<Endpoint> endpointInstance;
>>>
>>> ...
>>>
>>> endpointInstance.select(MockEndpoint.class, new
>>> UriLiteral("mock:outgoing")).get()
>>>
>>> Which consistently gives back (in Weld 1.1.x, 2.x, OWB 1.2.x and OWB
>> 1.6.x)
>>> an error that no beans are defined, even though I have that endpoint
>>> defined.
>>>
>>> Now, if I try the CDI 1.1 way of using the utility class to look up the
>>> instance, it works fine in Weld 2.x but not OWB 1.6.x. As far as I know,
>>> this setup should work in both, and since I know I use pattern in other
>>> apps I don't think its a case of a bug in the impl. I was wondering if
>> any
>>> camel gurus could comment on it?
>>>
>>>
>> https://github.com/johnament/camel/commit/05dd5f6f8cda541fedfc68c6f199e014defe3f09
>>>
>>> John
>>
>>
