Hello, I am analyzing the exception handling capabilities of Apache Camel (v2.16.x) and was wondering whether it is possible to propagate exceptions from a subroute (B; e.g., "from:direct") to the calling route (A; e.g., "to:direct") without setting ".errorHandler(noErrorHandler())".
A: from(..).onException(IOException.class)...process().to(direct:subroute); B: from(direct:subroute).*errorHandler(noErrorHandler())*.process(fails).to(..); The noErrorHandler flag on a subroute level disables all error handlers (e.g., global TransactionErrorHandler, DefaultErrorHandler). As a result the exception is propagated to the calling route (A). As suggested in many forums, this works fine, i.e., the exception is caught by the onException clause for further processing. However, if error handlers are required, the noErrorHandler cannot be set, which does not propagate the exception. Do you know a way how to ensure the described behavior? Thank you in advance. Best Regards, Daniel Ritter -- View this message in context: http://camel.465427.n5.nabble.com/Catch-All-for-Sub-Route-Exception-Handling-tp5781154.html Sent from the Camel - Users mailing list archive at Nabble.com.
