Ah right - you can however add the same exclusion to camel-quartz2 dependency.
regards Grzegorz 2016-07-08 15:56 GMT+02:00 habdank <habd...@gmail.com>: > Hi Grzegorz, > > I do not have direct dependency to: org.quartz-scheduler:quartz > > I have only: > > <dependency> > <groupId>org.apache.camel</groupId> > <artifactId>camel-quartz2</artifactId> > <version>2.17</version> > <dependency> > > And conflict is created internally in camel-quartz2, this pom is not really > mine. > > I can of course exclude c3p0 in camel-quartz2, and add it explicit on top > of > the camel-quartz2, > but this solution is pretty odd, because in fact the version of the c3p0 is > ruled by camel-quartz2 and not my project. > > Best regards, > Seweryn. > > > > > -- > View this message in context: > http://camel.465427.n5.nabble.com/Conflicting-c3p0-versions-tp5784962p5784964.html > Sent from the Camel - Users mailing list archive at Nabble.com. >
