Were you able to finally get it to work correctly? On Mon, Sep 26, 2016 at 1:10 AM, ncsibra <norbert_csi...@epam.com> wrote:
> Yes, weaveById works fine, but in my case I use it in a base class, used by > almost every integration test and those tests are able to modify the route > too before start, so I can't be sure that my originally first node is > really > still the first after the child test set up phase, that's why I used and > prefer the weaveAddFirst method. > And every integration test using a different route with different ids, so a > general solution with weaveAddFirst is better in my case. > > > > -- > View this message in context: http://camel.465427.n5.nabble. > com/weaveAddFirst-doesn-t-work-correctly-with-route-level-onException- > tp5787900p5788046.html > Sent from the Camel - Users mailing list archive at Nabble.com. >
