Sorry... I see what you are doing. Which is line 19? On Fri, Oct 28, 2016 at 3:32 PM, Steve973 <[email protected]> wrote:
> There is no way that you can aggregate like that. Both messages need to > be sent to the same endpoint, and they need to have some sort of > aggregation id in order for the aggregation to know which messages to > combine. Let me know if this is unclear or if you need more information. > > On Thu, Oct 27, 2016 at 7:06 PM, meng <[email protected]> wrote: > >> I change to .aggregate(simple("${body}"), new >> JoinReplyAggregationStrategy()), now no exceptions, but only returns the >> second exchange from route 2. No original payload comes in to >> aggregate.... >> >> >> >> -- >> View this message in context: http://camel.465427.n5.nabble. >> com/Problem-Concatenate-the-different-input-from-different- >> route-using-aggreagationStrategy-tp5789368p5789370.html >> Sent from the Camel - Users mailing list archive at Nabble.com. >> > >
