Can you be a little more specific on how it isn’t working? I tried a
simplified form of your file uri, and it seemed to work fine.
<route>
<from
uri="file:target/data?move=done/${bean:inboundCounter.incrementAndGet}-finished.txt"/>
<to uri="mock://complete" />
</route>
> On Dec 29, 2016, at 5:42 PM, Baltej Singh <bsi...@ra.rockwell.com> wrote:
>
> Quinn,
>
> Works great on its own, but not in the file components move attribute!
> <from id="_id2"
> uri="file:{{in.path}}?moveFailed=.failed/$simple{file:onlyname}&move={{archive-from-erp.path}}/${bean:inboundCounter.incrementAndGet}-{{common.fname.pattern}}"/>
>
>
> -----Original Message-----
> From: Quinn Stevenson [mailto:qu...@pronoia-solutions.com]
> Sent: Thursday, December 29, 2016 2:36 PM
> To: users@camel.apache.org
> Subject: Re: logging/incrementing simple counter
>
> I’d probably use and AtomicLong for this specific use case
>
> <bean id="execCounter" class="java.util.concurrent.atomic.AtomicLong" />
>
> <camelContext xmlns="http://camel.apache.org/schema/spring";>
> <route>
> <from uri="direct://trigger" />
> <log message="Exec Counter: ${bean:execCounter.incrementAndGet}" />
> </route>
> </camelContext>
>
>> On Dec 29, 2016, at 2:49 PM, Baltej Singh <bsi...@ra.rockwell.com> wrote:
>>
>> Following code works, but is there a better way to define the constant 1L in
>> Spring DSL Camel context?
>>
>> <bean class="java.lang.Long" id="longOne">
>> <constructor-arg index="0" value="1" />
>> </bean>
>> <bean class="java.lang.Long" id="execCount">
>> <constructor-arg index="0" value="1" />
>> </bean>
>>
>>
>> <log id="_id1"
>> message="${bean:execCount?method=sum(${bean:execCount.longValue},
>> ${bean:longOne.longValue})}" />
>>
>>
>>
>> -----Original Message-----
>> From: Baltej Singh
>> Sent: Thursday, December 29, 2016 12:08 PM
>> To: users@camel.apache.org
>> Subject: RE: logging/incrementing simple counter
>>
>> Thanks Quin - worked like a charm!
>>
>> What the recommended way to set the value on this bean?
>> What are the advantages/disadvantages of using groovy VS ${bean:..} syntax?
>
