Hello Claus,
Claus Ibsen-2 wrote > If you want an volatile exception member then provide a github PR Personally I think that for almost all integrators it makes sense for the DefaultExchange to not be thread safe. Incurring the cost of volatile member access for everyone, whether they need it or not, seems unnecessary to me. A more generic solution to allow integrators to choose whether they would like to pay the cost of synchronization if wanted and needed would be better. I think. Ralf -- View this message in context: http://camel.465427.n5.nabble.com/Concurrent-modification-of-DefaultExchange-tp5793968p5794279.html Sent from the Camel - Users mailing list archive at Nabble.com.
