Yes that is correct. For FQN classnames and the required work to initailize and instance of it (if needed) et all - is what the bean component is needed for
The process is for basic java where it requires an object instance. On Fri, Jan 22, 2021 at 3:14 PM David Holiday <david.holi...@holitek.io> wrote: > > Hello fellow camel riders! > > Whenever I make a processor I have to access it i. DSL using "to()". When I > attempt to access it using "process()" i get an error message telling me > the class could not be found in the registry. > > I did some experimentation and it seems as though I can use "process()" if > I supply a lambda. In my application I am supplying class names as > parameters to the DSL calls. > > Is it the case that "process()" isn't ok with taking a classname and > instead requires a processor object supplied either by lambda or by there > being an object already present in the registry? > > Thx!! -- Claus Ibsen ----------------- http://davsclaus.com @davsclaus Camel in Action 2: https://www.manning.com/ibsen2
