Sorry Claus,
do you have some news ?

Thanks
Marcello

On 2021/06/03 04:31:34, Claus Ibsen <claus.ib...@gmail.com> wrote: 
> On Wed, Jun 2, 2021 at 10:57 PM marcello cappelli <kcell...@gmail.com> wrote:
> >
> > Thank you so much for your support.
> > Unfortunately the result is the same.
> >
> > I don't understand where the answer gets lost.
> > By enabling the trace, I see that the method is executed and returns the 
> > result but Camel does not return it. I don't understand where I'm wrong
> >
> 
> Can you tell us where in the source code you see the method executed
> and the result coming back?
> And maybe can you look at the unit tests and see if you can add a new
> test for your use-case (or something close enough to trigger that
> method)
> so we can use that to track down and fix the bug.
> 
> > On 2021/06/02 04:21:39, Claus Ibsen <claus.ib...@gmail.com> wrote:
> > > Try without the result type class parameter, and just get the object
> > > as output and see what it looks like
> > >
> > > On Tue, Jun 1, 2021 at 10:20 PM marcello cappelli <kcell...@gmail.com> 
> > > wrote:
> > > >
> > > > Hi,
> > > > I get the same behavior even so:
> > > >
> > > > String  endpointUri     = 
> > > > "milo-client:opc.tcp://milo.digitalpetri.com:62541/milo?node=RAW(ns=2;s=Methods)&method=RAW(ns=2;s=Methods/sqrt(x))&defaultAwaitWrites=true&overrideHost=true";
> > > >
> > > > Variant[] inputArguments  = new Variant[1];
> > > > inputArguments[0] = new Variant((double) 25);
> > > >
> > > > Variant[] outputArguments = 
> > > > isoProducerTemplate.requestBody(endpointUri, inputArguments, 
> > > > Variant[].class);
> > > >
> > > > The response should be a 1 element variant array with the result
> > > >
> > >
> > >
> > > --
> > > Claus Ibsen
> > > -----------------
> > > http://davsclaus.com @davsclaus
> > > Camel in Action 2: https://www.manning.com/ibsen2
> > >
> 
> 
> 
> -- 
> Claus Ibsen
> -----------------
> http://davsclaus.com @davsclaus
> Camel in Action 2: https://www.manning.com/ibsen2
> 

Reply via email to