Yes. With .handled(true) it still stops the route immediately when stopOnException() is set.
Without .stopOnException() it just continues as normal. What I'm trying to do is to stop the split on exception but continue remaining steps in the route after the split. *Thanks* *Harsh* On Thu, Jul 15, 2021 at 2:00 AM Вячеслав Бойко <[email protected]> wrote: > Hi! > > Did you try > > .onException(YourException.class) > . handle(true) > > ? > > Harsh Karn <[email protected]> 14 июля 2021 г. 23:34:11 написал: > > > Hi, > > > > Is there any way to stop executing split on exception but continue > running > > the rest of the route after split or the outer route? > > > > I tried setting stopOnException() but it stops the route immediately and > > nothing can be done following the exception. > > > > I tried using aggregationtrategy but I don't see any option to stop > running > > split if I see exception raised or handled. > > > > *Thanks* > > *Harsh* > >
