Yes, absolutely, but again it will be a route for each kind of oauth flow
you need to follow. The request here is having a component for it.

Il giorno mer 29 set 2021 alle ore 02:04 Jeremy Ross <
jeremy.g.r...@gmail.com> ha scritto:

> I usually just create a route to do the OAuth dance. It's pretty simple.
>
> On Tue, Sep 28, 2021 at 2:01 PM Andrea Cosentino <anco...@gmail.com>
> wrote:
>
> > Yes, but it is an ad-hoc solution.. there are libraries trying to deal
> with
> > oauth, but it's really hard to cover all the cases. It's not a protocol.
> >
> > Il mar 28 set 2021, 20:57 ski n <raymondmees...@gmail.com> ha scritto:
> >
> > > The use cases will depend if you're on the server or client side. And
> > which
> > > OAuth flow is used.
> > >
> > > I for example had a use case for storing tokens. These tokens are 15
> > > minutes valid. When making a call which needs this token, it checks if
> > the
> > > token is still valid or not. When not, it refreshes the token and store
> > it
> > > in cache (
> > > https://camel.apache.org/components/latest/ehcache-component.html).
> > > In other cases, it reuses the token.
> > >
> > > Raymond
> > >
> > > Op di 28 sep. 2021 om 17:16 schreef Andrea Cosentino <
> anco...@gmail.com
> > >:
> > >
> > > > I think he is talking about a generic component which it's not the
> case
> > > for
> > > > the moment
> > > >
> > > > Il mar 28 set 2021, 17:13 Jeremy Ross <jeremy.g.r...@gmail.com> ha
> > > > scritto:
> > > >
> > > > > I believe some components handle OAuth (somewhat) transparently.
> > What's
> > > > the
> > > > > use case?
> > > > >
> > > > > On Fri, Sep 24, 2021 at 12:20 PM Andrea Cosentino <
> anco...@gmail.com
> > >
> > > > > wrote:
> > > > >
> > > > > > Not at the moment.
> > > > > >
> > > > > > Il giorno ven 24 set 2021 alle ore 19:11 Riggy Software <
> > > > > > riggy-softw...@hotmail.com> ha scritto:
> > > > > >
> > > > > > > Hi,
> > > > > > >
> > > > > > > Does Camel have Oath2?
> > > > > > > I can't find any component in release 3.
> > > > > > >
> > > > > > >
> > > > > > > Kind regards,
> > > > > > > Clark
> > > > > > >
> > > > > > >
> > > > > >
> > > > >
> > > >
> > >
> >
>

Reply via email to